E-News| Business News | News Digest | Events Calendar|Federal Register| Federal Agencies | State Agencies | Federal Courts | State Courts
 
Post Your Events Here....
Place Classified Ads Here...
Employers' Directory Here....
Become A Sponsor Here....
Place Job Ads Here....
Environmental News Link
 
Visit Our Sponsors' Directory
Sponsor Information Click Here!
Congress | State Legislatures | Sponsors Directory | Sponsor Information | Advertising | Classifieds | Jobs | Site Tour | Contact Us
 Sponsored Links
 
 
Sponsored Links 
 
See Your Message Here!
Pacific Legal foundation sues FWS over missed species status reviews in California

SACRAMENTO, CA (03/24/05) -- The Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) for failing to conduct mandatory status reviews required under the Endangered Species Act for nearly 200 of California’s listed species. PLF’s suit seeks to compel the FWS to meet its statutory obligation to review the status of every listed species at least every five years.

Under Section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. Section 1533(c)(2), the government must determine whether, based on current best available science, each listed species should have its status changed (i.e., either lowered from endangered to threatened or raised from threatened to endangered), or have its status as a listed species removed because protection is no longer justified. 

According to PLF’s complaint, the Fish and Wildlife Service has failed to perform the reviews for at least 193 species, or about two-thirds of the 298 species listed in California. As a result, PLF says the agency has no way of knowing if hundreds of species need more or less protection, or if they have been successfully recovered. 

"The Fish and Wildlife Service has a statutory duty to review the status of endangered species every five years, but it doesn’t do it," said PLF Principal Attorney Rob Rivett. "How is the public supposed to know if protections are working if the government doesn’t evaluate whether a species is doing better or worse? We’re simply asking the government to do what the Endangered Species Act requires it to do."

Rivett said the status review requirement can benefit species by revealing that a species’ status should be changed from threatened to endangered, thereby invoking greater protections. In addition, species that remain listed but no longer need protection divert resources from species that actually need them. 

PLF also argues that the continued listing of species that no longer need special protection means that burdensome land use restrictions are being unnecessarily imposed on California property owners. These restrictions are causing economic and bureaucratic burdens that are particularly devastating to the state’s agricultural industry. 

PLF is representing the California State Grange, the California Cattlemen’s Association, and the California Forestry Association. 

Headquarters are in Sacramento, California, the Pacific Legal Foundation is the nation’s oldest and largest public interest legal organization dedicated to defending private property rights. 

Sponsored Links 
 
See Your Message Here!


Endangered Species / Endangered Species Act

Endangered Species
Sponsored Links
Up
E-News | Business News | News Digest | Events Calendar|Federal Register | Federal Agencies | State Agencies | Federal Courts | State Courts
Congress | State Legislatures | Sponsors Directory | Sponsor Information | Advertising | Classifieds | Jobs | Site Tour | Contact Us
.
Environmental News Link
3450 Palmer Dr. #4-264
Cameron Park, California 95682
Telephone: (530) 676-9334 
FAX: (530) 676-9387
Email: capitol@caprep.com
Copyright © 2005 Capitol Reports. All Rights Reserved.